Skip to content

QStrike · Prove

Show how observed exposure can become a material attack path.

QStrike runs bounded cryptanalysis demonstrations on real quantum processors through commercial quantum clouds — see scope and limits.

Scope and limits

QStrike uses real commercial quantum-cloud services while QQ26 presents a 2030/2031 quantum-adversary perspective today. That range is not a predicted cryptographic-break date or Q-Day. QStrike does not directly break encryption. A governed side-channel and ephemeral leak expose nonce information. A Hidden Number Problem path and lattice reduction carry that leak to show how quantum capability can exploit observed cryptographic exposure.

QStrike - governed attack-path boundary

Exposure to evidence

What is exposed, why it matters, and what action follows — shown as a reviewable path, not a raw score.

  • Context · what is in scope
  • Evidence · what supports the claim
  • Exposed · what needs attention
  • Ready · what can move next
  1. Sample stage 1Selected finding

    Evidence candidate

  2. Sample stage 2Forward threat path

    RSA-2048 · TLS (sample)

  3. Sample stage 3Materiality

    Hostile review evidence

  4. Sample stage 4QStrike record

    Result · method · limit

Illustrative product view · synthetic data · not customer telemetry

Illustrative view with synthetic data. Not customer telemetry.

QStrike · attack path · Illustrative

The decision

Which observed weaknesses are material enough to validate, govern, and fund? It must distinguish an inventory concern from a path that warrants action.

Guided product demonstration

Every frame is labeled by evidence state, explains the decision it supports, and links to the method or public sample behind it.

QStrike · assessment console

What the operator sees

QStrike assessment console showing a governed attack-path run with quantum-cloud execution status, exposure-window prioritization, and the evidence review queue
Sanitized product screen. Composite, anonymized data; no customer telemetry. QStrike validates observed exposure through governed quantum-cloud execution paths; it does not directly break encryption.

QStrike outcomes

Decide which observed weaknesses warrant action

01

A selected attack path

Focus validation on the cryptographic weaknesses with real decision consequence.

02

Reviewable evidence

Preserve the method, boundary, result, and limitation for hostile review.

03

A governed response

Route material findings into owner decisions instead of another undifferentiated backlog.

Why QStrike

Real commercial quantum-cloud execution inside a strict public boundary

Real commercial quantum-cloud execution

Proof testing runs on real quantum processors across commercial quantum clouds, orchestrated by the QQ26 Intelligence Model — a hybrid system, not a modeled stand-in. QStrike uses real commercial quantum-cloud services while QQ26 presents a 2030/2031 quantum-adversary perspective today. That range is not a predicted cryptographic-break date or Q-Day. QStrike does not directly break encryption: a governed side-channel and ephemeral leak expose nonce information through a Hidden Number Problem path and lattice reduction.

A strict public boundary

QStrike does not directly break encryption or claim a production-key break. Its proof record binds authorized real quantum-cloud execution to the side-channel evidence, assumptions, result, and limitations.

$2M QStrike Challenge

Qualifying QStrike engagements may opt into separately published challenge terms. It is a marketing challenge with conditions, not a guarantee.

Read the QStrike Challenge terms

Operating method

Three governed validation moves

  1. 01

    Select the path

    QScout findings and buyer context define what QStrike is allowed to examine.

  2. 02

    Run the demonstration

    Authorized workloads execute on real QPUs through multi-quantum-cloud access under operator-controlled scope and stop conditions; the QQ26 Intelligence Model drives the run and records what was measured.

  3. 03

    Record the result

    The evidence package states what was observed, how the side-channel and ephemeral leak enter the HNP and lattice-reduction path, and what remains unproven.

Proof receipt

The public runtime boundary and integrity path, claim to limitation

Bounded product truth. No customer telemetry in this public view.

Claim
QStrike publishes its public runtime boundary and integrity verification path.
Scope
Public QStrike commercial quantum-cloud and integrity boundary; not customer execution or a direct encryption break.
Method
Read the governed attack-path method and integrity endpoint exactly as it reports.
Artifact
Provider-calibrated commercial quantum-cloud runtime · integrity receipt
Freshness
Runtime state is verified separately from this product description.
Status
bounded
Limitation
The public site does not claim a production-key break, customer execution, or provider endorsement.

Governed intake

Demonstration is governed, never self-serve.

QStrike demonstrations are operator-led. Qtonic Quantum Corp confirms the target, evidence-handling boundary, and stop conditions before a QStrike demonstration begins. Current intake: operator-scoped.

Request demonstration

Real QPUs · multi-quantum-cloud · QQ26 Intelligence Model

Proof testing runs on real quantum processors, across 6 commercial quantum clouds.

QStrike is a hybrid system. Authorized engagement workloads execute on real QPUs from 6 commercial providers spanning 4 physical modalities, reached through 8 cloud access services. The QQ26 Intelligence Model selects the path, drives the runs and binds every result to its evidence. QQ26 is Qtonic Quantum Corp's proprietary 35-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts, owned and controlled by the company. It spans quantum computing, quantum physics, cybersecurity, cryptography and applied mathematics with a one-million-token context window.

Every proof record names the provider, the access service, and what was measured. The public demonstration runtime on this site is not connected to live provider hardware — see the integrity boundary. QStrike does not directly break encryption or claim a production-key break.

Execution providers · real QPUs

  • IBM Quantum
  • IonQ
  • Quantinuum
  • Rigetti
  • QuEra
  • D-Wave

Cloud access services

  • Microsoft Azure Quantum
  • AWS Braket

Vendor marks identify the commercial services used by authorized QStrike workloads. They do not imply endorsement, customer relationship, or a direct encryption break. Google Quantum AI (Willow) is a published calibration input, not an execution path.

6 Commercial Quantum-Cloud Paths

6 execution paths across 4 physical modalities

Six commercial quantum-cloud execution paths across four physical modalities: superconducting, trapped-ion, neutral-atom, and annealing. Authorized engagement workloads run on these providers' real QPUs, orchestrated by the QQ26 Intelligence Model. The public demonstration runtime on this site is not connected to live provider hardware.

  • SuperconductingCommercial cloud

    IBM Quantum

    Heron r3 + Nighthawk

    Published access and rationale

    Published access context: IBM Quantum Cloud

    Superconducting gate-model lane for adversary-circuit execution and cross-vendor consistency.

  • SuperconductingCommercial cloud

    Rigetti Computing

    Cepheus-1-108Q

    Published access and rationale

    Published access context: Rigetti QCS + AWS Braket

    Independent superconducting lane for cross-vendor consistency on the same physical layer.

  • Trapped-IonCommercial cloud

    Quantinuum

    Helios

    Published access and rationale

    Published access context: Quantinuum direct API + partner clouds

    High-fidelity trapped-ion lane for bounded validation and trapped-ion cross-checks.

  • Trapped-IonCommercial cloud

    IonQ

    Tempo

    Published access and rationale

    Published access context: IonQ direct + AWS Braket + Microsoft Azure Quantum

    Independent trapped-ion vendor lane with multi-cloud access redundancy.

  • Neutral-AtomCommercial cloud

    QuEra Computing

    Aquila

    Published access and rationale

    Published access context: AWS Braket

    Neutral-atom modality lane for selected combinatorial attack-chain execution.

  • AnnealingCommercial cloud

    D-Wave Quantum

    Advantage

    Published access and rationale

    Published access context: D-Wave Leap + AWS Marketplace

    Annealing lane for combinatorial candidate prioritization and bounded search-space exploration.