job_0003
Running
Provider
Profile A
Qubits
127
Shots
1024
Circuit execution47%
q0
q1
q2
q3
H
Ry
C
Rz
H
X
X
H
Ry
C
Rz
C
C
X
H
Ry
C
Rz
H
Rz
C
X
H
Ry
M
M
M
M
HXCNOTRyRz
ECDSA-P256Public proof lane
OMB M-26-15 is here - 110 days remaining
Federal agencies have until Oct 22, 2026 to submit PQC Migration Plans. Qtonic Quantum Corp helps produce cryptographic inventory, CBOM-grade visibility, and prioritization evidence.
QStrike 7.0 — Forward-Threat Validation
QStrike validates priority cryptographic risk under forward-threat assumptions
In plain terms: QStrike shows where a near-future quantum-equipped attacker could exploit implementation weaknesses in the cryptography you run today — then hands you signed, reviewable evidence of exactly where and how.
Visualized from the QStrike validation console: provider-aligned workflow cards, telemetry progress, and signed-artifact cues. No customer jobs, live targets, or customer data are shown here.
Provider reference set
Commercial execution profiles plus reference inputs
IBM Quantum
superconducting
Calibrated profile · credentialed access path
status: profiled
IonQ
trapped-ion
Calibrated profile · multi-cloud reachability
status: profiled
Quantinuum
trapped-ion
Calibrated profile · highest published two-qubit fidelity
status: profiled
Rigetti
superconducting
Calibrated profile · independent error profile
status: profiled
D-Wave
annealing
Calibrated profile · classical-fallback for portions
status: profiled
QuEra
neutral-atom
Calibrated profile · neutral-atom architecture
status: profiled
Engagement workload mix is recorded per customer scope. Published-benchmark calibration inputs such as Google Willow stay outside the execution set; customer workloads do not run on them.
The 2029 anchor
Google and Cloudflare set 2029 migration targets; Meta proves internet-scale hybrid TLS
Google and Cloudflare have public 2029 migration targets. Meta has demonstrated hybrid post-quantum TLS at internet scale. QStrike validates where your existing cryptography stands against the same horizon, and QSolve sequences the migration ahead of it.
The operating window is anchored to the 2029 readiness calendar, without countdown framing or fear-based urgency.
2029 readiness window
Loading CRQC risk window.
Google and Cloudflare set public 2029 migration targets; Meta demonstrates hybrid post-quantum TLS at internet scale. QSolve sequences migration ahead of that readiness window.
- Google · March 25 2026
- Cloudflare · April 7 2026 (opens in new tab)
- Meta · April 16 2026 (opens in new tab)
Cloudflare reports approximately 65% of human-initiated traffic using post-quantum encryption as of April 2026.
Honest limit
What QStrike does — and what it does not
“QStrike does not break RSA-2048 or ECC-256 in production. The hardware to do that does not exist commercially as of June 2026. Today, QStrike validates scoped implementation weaknesses, leakage paths, and modeled quantum-adversary assumptions using published cryptanalytic methods and reviewable evidence.”
— Commercial White Paper §1 + §10 FAQ
QStrike operates passively at the data plane. No packet injection. No credential replay. No coercion of a session. No attempt to retrieve a key from a live system.
- 48-72hFirst Findings Window
- 6Commercial Execution Platforms
- 4Physical Modalities
- 120dRepresentative Engagement
Intelligence Model
Domain-specific orchestration · NDA-bound architecture detail · 5-domain training
The Intelligence Model orchestrates a four-stage loop end-to-end inside every QStrike engagement: candidate generation, routing decisions, validation execution, and adversarial review. Stages 1–3 run deterministic inference; stage 4 prompts a separate Intelligence Model instance, configured as a hostile auditor, to attempt to break each surviving finding.
- Stage 1Candidate generationThe Intelligence Model enumerates indirect-brute-force candidates from the captured cryptographic surface.
- Stage 2Routing decisionsEach candidate routes to the modality and platform profile best suited to validate it.
- Stage 3Validation executionQuantum cloud platforms execute the bounded workload; cross-platform consistency framework filters discrepancies.
- Stage 4Adversarial reviewA separate Intelligence Model instance, configured as a hostile auditor, attempts to falsify every surviving finding.
Each finding passes through human cryptographic engineer review before it reaches the customer-bound evidence package.
Platform Capabilities
Operator-Led Quantum Validation
Governed workflow evidence, provider-aligned testing context, and release-bound proof across the current public provider set. Private walkthroughs and scoped customer engagements add target-specific validation and executive reporting.
⚡
Engagement Management
Coordinate multi-target engagements across distributed infrastructure with real-time validation orchestration and live engineer handoff.
🔬
Quantum Platform Coverage
Coordinate provider-aligned workflow profiles across commercial quantum-cloud execution paths, then capture signed evidence for scoped engagements. Research-reference calibration inputs are maintained separately from the execution set.
📊
Live Telemetry
Real-time operation monitoring with instant feedback loops for adaptive validation adjustments during active engagements.
🔒
Zero Trust Architecture
Cookie-backed operator access, signed stream telemetry, and release-bound evidence keep the website posture auditable without overstating the control plane.
📈
Advanced Analytics
Provider-calibrated workflow analysis highlights cryptographic exposure, evidence confidence, and recovery priority across the public evidence posture.
🌐
Global Infrastructure
Same-origin website delivery keeps the governed QStrike preview fast, consistent, and operationally aligned with the production validation lane.
Security & Compliance
Engagement Security Posture
QStrike is designed for environments that require controlled access, auditability, signed evidence, and governed documentation.
🔐
FedRAMP control mapping
✓
NIST 800-171 mapping
Signed diligence artifacts available on request. FedRAMP-scoped mapping support is available where engagement scope requires it.
Procurement
Operator-scoped procurement
QStrike, QScout, and QSolve are custom-scoped per customer environment rather than sold as a fixed-tier ladder. Engagement scope scales by environment complexity, validation depth, and operating commitment rather than by employee count or seat count.
Direct contract with Qtonic Quantum Corp
Custom commercial terms, evidence-handling protocols, and engagement-specific SLAs. Best fit when the engagement requires unusual scope, federal-customer accommodations, or industry-specific compliance overlays.
Book a scoping conversationOperator intake
Contact/ticket intake for governed enterprise provisioning. Best fit when the buyer needs approved scope, controlled evidence handling, and operator-reviewed delivery.
Request QStrike scopingQStrike output is structured to be portable by design. Customers can take findings to a different migration partner if they choose.
Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
What makes QStrike different from classical pentesting tools?
QStrike is designed to combine an Intelligence Model orchestration loop, six commercial quantum-cloud execution platforms, published-benchmark calibration inputs kept outside the execution set, an indirect-brute-force methodology engine, and a hostile-review-ready evidence system into one engagement model. The website presents governed evidence for that workflow on a provider-calibrated modeled runtime before a scoped customer engagement begins.
Does QStrike break RSA-2048 or ECC-256 today?
No. No commercial quantum system can do that as of June 2026. The hardware to break those primitives at scale does not exist commercially. What QStrike does is identify and validate the indirect-brute-force attack paths that turn the customer existing cryptographic exposure into tractable problems for a 2030 to 2031 adversary.
How long does a QStrike engagement take?
A representative engagement runs approximately 120 days across four phases: scoping under NDA (Days 1–30), operational capture (Days 30–60), forward-threat validation (Days 60–100), and delivery & migration sequencing (Days 100–120). Smaller environments compress; larger environments extend. Time to first findings: typically 48-72 hours.
What compliance frameworks does QStrike support?
Compliance mapping covers PCI DSS 4.0.1, NIST SP 800-82 R3, IEC 62443-3-3, NIST IR 8547, NIST CSWP 39, CNSA 2.0, and the G7 financial-sector roadmap. Reports include executive summaries, technical findings, and a sequenced six-phase QSolve remediation roadmap aligned to a 2029 readiness target.
Ready to remediate? Meet QSolve
QScout predicts your vulnerabilities. QStrike assesses priority risk through governed evidence. QSolve prepares them. Dedicated PQR expert CISOs work at your direction with standards-mapped orchestration to achieve post-quantum readiness by 2029.
Academic and disclosed-vulnerability literature
QStrike findings cite published literature and disclosed vulnerabilities. The references below anchor the indirect-brute-force methodology to peer-reviewed and CVE-disclosed primary sources that an adversarial reviewer can independently verify.
- EUCLEAK (Infineon, 2024).ECDSA side-channel key extraction in the Infineon SLE78 secure-element family.CVE-2024-45678— this disclosed vulnerability is the canonical real-world precedent for the side-channel + ephemeral-leak attack class QStrike validates against.
- Boneh & Venkatesan (1996).Hardness of computing the most significant bits of secret keys in Diffie-Hellman and related schemes. CRYPTO '96. The Hidden Number Problem (HNP) reduction underpinning QStrike's lattice-attack chain when nonce bits leak.
- Gidney (2025).How to factor 2048-bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits, arXiv:2505.15917 — current best-known fault-tolerant resource estimate for Shor at RSA-2048 in the fault-tolerant regime; QStrike validates the indirect path that becomes tractable well before fault-tolerant hardware exists.
- Google Willow research program (March 2026).ECDLP cryptanalytic resource estimates published as part of the Willow research program; cited as a research-reference calibration input, not as part of the QStrike execution set.
- Caltech · Oratomic (April 2026).Neutral-atom array fidelity and reconfigurability results referenced in QStrike's cross-platform validation framework.
Full per-finding citations are bundled with the deliverable evidence package and reproducible from the released master-bundle.
Private scoping required
Watch the 24-hour Phase 3 forward-threat validation slice
Review the governed evidence console at qstrike.qtonicquantum.com/demo. The full 2030–2031 adversary engagement is custom-scoped at approximately 120 days. First findings typically arrive in 48-72 hours.
The public evidence console shows the 24-hour Phase 3 validation slice. The full engagement is custom-scoped per customer environment.
Cryptographic provenance
Verify this engagement
For full per-platform access posture, calibration sources, integrity controls, and the live-hardware integration roadmap — read the Hardware Platform Integrity Attestation v1.0.
Market validation for QStrike
Authentication, certificates, signing, and trust chains need proof before migration risk compounds.
The market signal is not just encryption. It is authentication, impersonation, downgrade, signing, and controlled validation before production change.
Third-party quotations and source references are provided solely as public market, policy, and technical context for post-quantum readiness. They do not imply endorsement, sponsorship, certification, partnership, resale authorization, or validation of Qtonic Quantum, QScout, QStrike, QSolve, or Qtonic Quantum Lab by the quoted individual, publisher, agency, company, or organization. Third-party names and marks belong to their owners.
Regulatory references are informational and may apply differently by jurisdiction, agency, system classification, contract, and final rulemaking. This is not legal or compliance advice.
PolicyJune 22, 2026
White House EO 14412
“collecting United States information now, and decrypting it later”
QScout predicts harvestable exposure; QStrike demonstrates which paths matter under governed scope.
PolicyJune 24, 2026
OMB M-26-15
“Manual processes are often inadequate for this migration scope.”
QScout becomes the front door; QSolve turns inventory and risk evidence into accountable CryptoAgility execution.
StandardsCurrent project page
NIST NCCoE Migration to PQC
“controlled, non-production environment”
QStrike and QLab support non-destructive validation and reviewable readiness evidence before migration pressure hits production.
StandardsCurrent project page
NIST CSRC PQC Project
“find and prioritize vulnerable systems”
QScout is positioned as quantum cyber risk and vulnerability intelligence, not generic vulnerability scanning.
M-26-15 validation path
QStrike for priority technical validation
QStrike gives higher-assurance environments a governed path to validate priority cryptographic findings before migration decisions carry engineering cost.
Evidence
Scoped validation
Evidence
Forward-threat evidence
Evidence
QScout handoff path
Provider Assurance Boundary
Some infrastructure assurance belongs to the underlying provider. It supports buyer diligence, but it is not a Qtonic Quantum-held certification or attestation.
Provider-held SOC 1Provider-held SOC 2Provider-held SOC 2 HIPAAProvider-held ISO 27001Provider-held ISO 27017Provider-held ISO 27018Provider-held ISO 27701Provider-held ISO 22301Provider-held ISO 9001
Compatible withIBM QuantumIonQQuantinuumRigetti