Scoring Methodology
Every score is reproducible, auditable, and signed. Two independent agents evaluate each solution — if they disagree beyond threshold, the score is held for manual review. No vendor can influence their ranking.
10-Dimension Scoring
Each PQC solution is evaluated across algorithm compliance, key management, performance overhead, migration readiness, interoperability, documentation quality, security audit history, community health, standards alignment, and deployment maturity. Scores are weighted and normalized to a 0-100 Qtonic Quantum Score.
Dual-Consensus Protocol
Two scoring agents independently evaluate each solution. If their scores diverge beyond a calibrated threshold, the result enters a hold state for manual arbitration. This eliminates single-agent bias and scoring drift.
Published Results With Review Status
Every published score follows a 10-dimension published rubric with expert oversight and full audit trail.
Evidence Hierarchy
Not all evidence is equal. Qtonic Quantum Lab classifies every data point into four tiers, and scoring weights adjust accordingly. Vendor claims without code-level verification receive the lowest confidence.
1
repo_runtime—Runtime Evidence
Verified through scoped engagement evidence or PQC test vectors. Highest confidence.
2
repo_static—Static Analysis
Source code inspected for algorithm implementation, key management, and migration readiness.
3
web_only—Web Documentation
Claims verified through published documentation, changelogs, and API references.
4
metadata_only—Metadata Only
Vendor claims without verification. Lowest confidence tier.