Loading page content
Evidence signature
Public signals bind to governed proof.
No customer data.
QScout proof sequence. Evidence Handshake. public-to-private proof path. No customer data.
Qtonic Quantum Lab scores are generated through automated evaluation using publicly available evidence. Scores reflect conditions at the time of evaluation and may change as solutions evolve. Vendors may request a retest at any time. See our fidelity commitment for full details.
Some infrastructure assurance belongs to the underlying provider. It supports buyer diligence, but it is not a Qtonic Quantum-held certification or attestation.
Evidence · 12 standards tracked
PQC solution evidence is mapped against 12 regulatory and industry standards for technical review. Evidence status is disclosed instead of presenting legal compliance determinations.
NIST
Specifies ML-KEM (formerly CRYSTALS-Kyber), a key-encapsulation mechanism based on the Module Learning With Errors problem. Defines three parameter sets: ML-KEM-512 (NIST Level 1), ML-KEM-768 (Level 3), and ML-KEM-1024 (Level 5).
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
NIST
Specifies ML-DSA (formerly CRYSTALS-Dilithium), a digital signature algorithm based on the Module Learning With Errors problem. Defines three parameter sets: ML-DSA-44 (NIST Level 2), ML-DSA-65 (Level 3), and ML-DSA-87 (Level 5).
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
Roadmap
Aug 2024
FIPS 203, 204, 205 finalized by NIST
2025
CNSA 2.0 browser/server transition milestone for applicable NSS use cases
2026
NSM-10 federal inventory and prioritization planning milestone
2029
Readiness control window for provable PQC migration evidence
2030
CNSA 2.0 legacy networking transition horizon
2033
CNSA 2.0 full transition horizon for applicable NSS populations
Lab Journey
Overview
Strict-verified registry and queue entry point
Leaderboard
Strict-verified public leaderboard
Our Approach
Scoring and evidence model
Coverage
Strict-verified registry vs research queue
Standards
Compliance tracking and deadlines
Fidelity
Proof, signing, and retest policy
Changelog
Public revisions and retests
Compare
Side-by-side PQC evaluation
Next Steps
Qtonic Quantum Lab scores are independent research opinions based on a published quantitative rubric and automated evaluation of publicly available evidence. Domain-expert review controls are independent of the automated evaluation system, and provenance labels disclose when evidence is verified, contested, inferred, or degraded. No vendor pays for inclusion, ranking, or evaluation. Scores do not constitute endorsement, certification, or legal advice. Methodology is uniformly applied and publicly disclosed. All product names and trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Solution maintainers may request a methodology retest at any time. Full research disclaimer.
NIST
Specifies SLH-DSA (formerly SPHINCS+), a stateless hash-based digital signature algorithm. Provides conservative security assumptions based solely on hash function properties. Defines 12 parameter sets across SHA-256 and SHAKE variants.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
NSA
NSA guidance for National Security Systems transitioning to quantum-resistant algorithms. Identifies ML-KEM-1024, ML-DSA-87, and SLH-DSA for relevant NSS profiles and sets staged transition milestones through 2033; applicability depends on system category, mission owner, and governing contract language.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
White House
Presidential directive requiring federal agencies to inventory cryptographic systems, identify vulnerable assets, and prioritize migration to quantum-resistant cryptography. Establishes 180-day and 1-year milestones for agency cryptographic inventory completion.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
White House
Executive order mandating software supply chain security, SBOMs, zero trust architecture, and encryption standards for federal contractors. Requires NIST-approved cryptographic modules and secure software development practices.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
PCI SSC
Payment card industry standard requiring strong cryptography for cardholder data protection. Version 4.0 introduces targeted risk analysis for cryptographic controls and acknowledges future quantum threats. Requires documented crypto inventory and key management procedures.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
HHS
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act security rule requiring encryption of electronic protected health information (ePHI) in transit and at rest. While not prescribing specific algorithms, references NIST guidance and requires addressable encryption implementation.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
European Union
EU regulation requiring appropriate technical measures to protect personal data, including encryption. Article 32 mandates state-of-the-art cryptographic controls. Organizations processing EU resident data must demonstrate adequate protection against evolving threats including quantum computing.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
South Africa
South African data protection law requiring appropriate technical measures to secure personal information. Section 19 mandates encryption and security safeguards aligned with accepted industry standards. Applies to any organization processing data of South African residents.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
Singapore
Singapore data protection framework requiring reasonable security arrangements for personal data. The PDPC has issued guidelines recommending encryption as a key protective measure. Singapore is a regional hub for financial services and cloud computing with high PQC readiness requirements.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
Brazil
Brazilian general data protection law requiring technical security measures including encryption for personal data. Article 46 mandates adequate protection against unauthorized access. Applies to any organization processing data of Brazilian residents regardless of where the organization is located.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
SWIFT
SWIFT Customer Security Programme requiring SWIFT-connected institutions to meet mandatory security controls. The 2026 update introduces PQC readiness and transition planning for payment messaging infrastructure. Covers key management, secure messaging, and cryptographic agility for correspondent banking networks.
What Qtonic Quantum Lab evaluates:
Monthly insights on PQC migration and quantum risk. No spam.
Provider Infrastructure: SOC 1SOC 2SOC 2 HIPAAISO 27001ISO 27017ISO 27018ISO 27701ISO 22301ISO 9001 + 5 more — Inherited cloud controls documented via Zoho Cloud. Trust Center
Release proof entry pointBuild 1de4a9317aceLab: signed snapshot proofQStrike: synthetic E2E proofQScout: backend health proofRelease Proof
© 2024–2026 Qtonic Quantum Corp.
Miami, FL HQ · Be’er Sheva R&D