Executive control room
Y2Q is not a date. It is a board-control window: confidentiality lifetime plus migration time, compared against a documented CRQC planning scenario.
Mosca margin
Control window already exceeded by 4 years
2029 framing
Readiness assumption, not a break-date claim
Materials
2/2 official PDFs ready
Evidence packet
0/5 categories identified
Mosca inequality
confidentiality lifetime + migration time > CRQC scenario
Control window already exceeded by 4 years
Exposure (X+Y−Z): 10 + 4 − 10 = 4. Remaining margin (Z−X−Y) = -4 (deficit).
Replace the defaults with your board-approved scenario and record the source. This instrument supports governance review; it is not a quantum capability forecast.
Board package
This self-check identifies whether the required evidence categories exist. It does not certify readiness, replace independent proof, or create an attestation.
Evidence package not established
0%Independent validation is still required before board attestation.
Executive takeaways
Frame
Y2K had a fixed date, a mechanical remediation, and a clean test on January 1, 2000. Quantum migration has scenario uncertainty, many ownership boundaries, and no single morning when leadership knows every dependency was fixed.
Official materials
These PDFs are the portable companion materials for the Y2Q executive briefing. The on-page control room is the interactive HTML equivalent for assumptions, evidence, and next actions.
Board brief
Board-language summary of the Y2Q control window, Mosca inequality, governance rule, and management asks.
Prepared by Qtonic Quantum Corp. HTML summary is provided on this page; the PDF is the portable meeting artifact.
Download Board briefWebinar deck
Session companion PDF for the Breaking Encryption: Y2Q and the Quantum Countdown executive briefing.
Prepared by Qtonic Quantum Corp. HTML summary is provided on this page; the PDF is the portable meeting artifact.
Download Webinar deckSources and assumptions
Use these references as starting points. Replace the default CRQC scenario, retention period, and migration duration with organization-owned inputs before presenting the output as a decision artifact.
NIST PQC standards
FIPS 203, 204, and 205 are the first finalized post-quantum standards; migration planning should start from the official standards and transition guidance.
CNSA 2.0 / NSA
CNSA 2.0 gives specific transition requirements for National Security Systems. It is a strong policy signal, not a universal commercial deadline.
Google 2029 timeline
Google frames 2029 as its post-quantum cryptography migration timeline. This page treats it as a readiness assumption, not a CRQC break-date claim.
GRI 2025 survey signal
The Global Risk Institute report is an expert-survey input on uncertainty and planning urgency, not deterministic forecast evidence.
Mosca / XYZ framing
The control test compares confidentiality lifetime and migration duration against a threat-arrival scenario. Each variable should carry an owner and source.
Next moves
Find public and internal-facing cryptographic exposure before approving a remediation budget.
ContinueMove from current-state cryptography to hybrid readiness to post-quantum readiness.
ContinueSee how evidence, severity, and proof artifacts are structured for review.
Continue